I also ran into a conflict. I will definitely secure next week since we need to resurrect the profiles work. I will also try to recruit again the involved parties. Eran

I guess we cancel tomorrow’s meeting due to OSLCFest Eran Gery – Global Industry Solutions Lead, IBM ELM

Good question…. I believe the meeting is anchored to the US timezone so 10EDT Eran

Jad This is correct. But imo we need to put it in the standard roadmap. Validity is essential for linked data processes to stay outside. Eran

David It does represents a state within the resource, not necessarily the total state represented by its memory footprint. This is similar to where we use explicit state models of objects, that abstra

Worth adding that the hash represents a state of a resource, as validity is across particular resource states. A specific way to encode a state is considering a version of a resource. That means that

Jad Suspect links related to any oslc link. not specific to “parent/child”. A classical use case is a link between a requirement and a design element that refines it. Also, Suspect information depends

Thanks Michael What is the practical meaning of “same OID server”. Is that a reasonable constraint? Does it have to be JAS? How can a bi-directional link scenario with DNG for example will work with s

Let’s discuss… More precisely. I should have said anyone that integrates with ELM reporting like Sodius and I believe also MID and SBE Vision. It would be interesting to hear from PTC is they implemen

Guys, The bi-directional profile cannot rely on resource shapes as I noted earlier. It is the next tier after most basic. Currently no one outside ELM implements shapes. What makes sense to me is that

Patrick So what is your policy for link storage? Which side stores the link? Thanks Eran

Ed, Jim did not accept the text as he is not sure that the “store on outgoing side” is respected by ELM. Can you comment on that. One comment I have is that it is enough that it is the 90% case as a p

Ed Please review the link ownership text Link ownership In bi-derctional linking scenarios both OSLC participants are aware of links across their owned resources and enable link visibility and navigat

Hi Jim Here are quick notes from yesterday. The meeting focused on allocating the profiles sections. Here are people that signed up for sections: **basic topics** Root Services – Jim A Authentication

Jim - no… i guess it will wait for tomorrow… Eran

Thanks Jim! Attached is a consolidated version of the document… I accepted most of the proposed changes. Best regards, Eran

Hi Robert The profiles do not focus on ELM, but where there are choices to be made (mostly around link storage) we align with ELM choices as they are also most widely known. Also, ELM is currently the

Hi All I have a conflict tomorrow.. I sent out a draft document for the linking profiles intent and requirements… please send me comments/feedback by email Thanks, Eran Gery – Global Industry Solution

Hi All Here is an initial draft of the outline, motivation, and solution requirements for the OSLC linking profiles supplement Best regards, Eran Gery – Global Industry Solutions Lead, IBM ELM

It is now here https://meet.jit.si/oslc-op