ReSpec updated to target this mailing list
Nick Crossley <nick_crossley@...>
The OSLC OP ReSpec (tab-respec on GitHub) has been updated to use this mailing list (oslc-op@...) as the default address to which non-members are invited to send comments. You can override this by setting conf variables:
|
|
Event: oslc-op Weekly Contributors Meeting
#cal-invite
oslc-op@lists.oasis-open-projects.org Calendar <oslc-op@...>
oslc-op Weekly Contributors Meeting When: Where: Organizer: Description:
|
|
Minutes 2019-06-20
Hello everyone,
The minutes from the OSLC Open Project general meeting today have been published under https://github.com/oslc-op/oslc-admin/blob/master/minutes/2019/2019-06-20.md The next meeting will take place on June 27 at 14:00 UTC (16:00 CEST or 10:00 EDT). The details can be found in the calendar: https://lists.oasis-open-projects.org/g/oslc-op/ics/4043370/1201863955/feed.ics ( more details under https://lists.oasis-open-projects.org/g/oslc-op/calendar ) Cheers, Andrew
|
|
Broadcast: Broadcast: oslc-op Weekly Contributors Meeting (Jun 27 10:00 AM GMT in https://meet.jit.si/oslc-op) (Jun 27 10:00 AM GMT in https:/meet.jit.si/oslc-op)
|
|
Re: Broadcast: Broadcast: oslc-op Weekly Contributors Meeting (Jun 27 10:00 AM GMT in https://meet.jit.si/oslc-op) (Jun 27 10:00 AM GMT in https:/meet.jit.si/oslc-op)
What is a "broadcast"? :D
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
--
–Andrew.
|
|
Cancelled: oslc-op Weekly Contributors Meeting
|
|
Updated Event: oslc-op Weekly Contributors Meeting
#cal-invite
oslc-op@lists.oasis-open-projects.org Calendar <oslc-op@...>
oslc-op Weekly Contributors Meeting When: Where: Organizer: Description:
|
|
Broadcast: oslc-op Weekly Contributors Meeting (Jun 27 10:00 AM GMT in https://meet.jit.si/oslc-op)
oslc-op contributors weekly telecon.
OASIS OSLC Open Project group home: https://lists.oasis-open-projects.org/g/oslc-op Dial-in instructions: https://hackmd.io/GBxx8iRLS3Sf-VvZM2z1Dw?both#Dial-in-details oslc-op GitHub Organization: https://github.com/oslc-op Meeting room: https://meet.jit.si/oslc-op ( https://meet.jit.si/oslc-op ) Meeting minutes: https://hackmd.io/@driib/oslc-op-minutes/edit Mailing list: oslc-op@... (archives: https://lists.oasis-open-projects.org/g/oslc-op ) (See attached file: invite.ics)
|
|
Broadcast: Broadcast: oslc-op Weekly Contributors Meeting (Jun 27 10:00 AM GMT in https://meet.jit.si/oslc-op) (Jun 27 10:00 AM GMT in https:/meet.jit.si/oslc-op)
|
|
Re: Broadcast: Broadcast: oslc-op Weekly Contributors Meeting (Jun 27 10:00 AM GMT in https://meet.jit.si/oslc-op) (Jun 27 10:00 AM GMT in https:/meet.jit.si/oslc-op)
Sorry, I won't be available this Thursday Jun 27.
|
|
Next steps for OSLC OP Specifications
This same content
is captured in https://github.com/oslc-op/oslc-specs/issues/56but is included in an email to the oslc-op mailing list to ensure wider
distribution:
Here's a summary of an OP project specification lifecycle: 1 PGB can with 14 day notice vote to create a Project Specification Draft (PSD) revision anytime, and simply tags it in the repo, nothing is published 2 Project Specification Draft can with 14 day notice be promoted to Project Specification (PS) by PGB Special Majority Vote, subject to specification conformance review by OASIS OP Admin 3 Project Specification can be promoted to OASIS Standard i With 3 statements of use, Submission of a Candidate OASIS Standard (COS) to the TC Administrator, ii Completion of a public review lasting a minimum of 60 days, and iii A call for consent to approve the COS as OASIS Standard. iv A potential single, second call for consent after addressing negative comments. See https://www.oasis-open.org/policies-guidelines/open-projects-process#project-specificationsfor details. In order to proceed we need to do the following: 1. Finish any document edits and ReSpec changes 2. Produce HTML and PDF documents and review for template conformance with Chet 3. Schedule a PGB vote to create Project Specification Drafts (PSD) for all documents 4. Schedule Special Majority Vote two weeks later to promote PSDs to Project Specifications (PS) and publish PS HTML and PDF revisions to OASIS Library 5. For Core, AM, CM, QM and RM specs, collect 3 statements of use and schedule Special Majority Vote to promote those Project Specifications to COS and submit to 60 day public review 6. Respond to review and Call for Consent issues as needed to progress to OASIS Standard -- Jim Amsden, Senior Technical Staff Member ELM Quality Manager 919-525-6575
|
|
AA warning on the RM 2.1 CSPRD01
Hello Chet,
What does this notice mean? https://docs.oasis-open.org/oslc-domains/oslc-rm/v2.1/csprd01/AA-README-Warning-Do-Not-Download.txt -- –Andrew.
|
|
Re: Next steps for OSLC OP Specifications
Thanks! I would expect we produce only one PS in the end?
--
/Andrew
(from phone)
|
|
Re: Submitting the Quality Management Open Project Specification for public review
Thanks a lot, Chet!
I want to make sure I got this right, so let me make some comments
and please correct me if I got this wrong in any way:
1) We are not submitting a spec for public review. Instead, OP maintainers
are preparing to ask the PGB to approve a Project Specification Draft 04 (we will skip PSDs 1 to 3 for Core to avoid any confusion with the CSPRDs 1 to 3 published by the Core TC, I don't know how many CSPRDs were published by the Domains TC for the QM spec).
The only approval required for this is from PGB, with 14 days notice. No approval from OASIS administrator is needed: https://www.oasis-open.org/policies-guidelines/open-projects-process#project-specifications,
§13.3 (not sure what does the term Designated Branch refers to).
2) We do not have to use OASIS infrastructure to publish a PSD or
to produce PDFs. We are planning to make a PR with the changes to the document revision, status and links and tag it on Github with a tag 'psd-04', for example.
3) I suggest to have all comments on the PSDs to be submitted as Github issues.
4) The specification will not be provided under the Apache 2.0 license. Apache license is best suited for the source code. The text of the spec will be CC BY 4.0 licensed (Attribution 4.0 International). Vocabulary and OSLC Shape machine-readable documents will be provided under the Apache 2.0 license. Did I miss something?
Also, we had some discussion in the OP call regarding the naming of the specs and publishing of the PDFs. Chet, we are still working it out but I would appreaciate if you follow/participate in https://github.com/oslc-op/oslc-admin/issues/6.
/Andrew
From:
Chet Ensign <chet.ensign@...>
Sent: 26 June 2019 23:51 To: Jim Amsden Cc: Andrii Berezovskyi Subject: Re: Submitting the Quality Management Open Project Specification for public review Jim, Andrew, I'm spending the afternoon catching up on all this. Apologies for falling behind...
Yes and that's done.
Yes, this section looks good.
That sounds right. I'll look at the text in CONTRIB
now and may make a suggestion via pull request.
Suggest linking these to the licenses. Apache 2.0 - https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 -
CC-BY 4.0 - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
Note that any machine-readable content (Computer Language Definitions) declared Normative for this Work Product is provided in separate plain text files. In the event of a discrepancy between any such plain text file and display content in the Work Product's prose narrative document(s), the content in the separate plain text file prevails. Not yet. Let me sort that out.
Yes. Still TBD.
I'm not sure what you mean by 'publish'
here. Hand them off to us to load and announce?
I'm not sure of the import of this either.
Are the resource shapes something different from the QM Spec?
/chet ---------------- Chet Ensign
Chief Technical Community Steward
OASIS: Advancing open standards for the information society http://www.oasis-open.org Mobile: +1 201-341-1393
|
|
Re: Next steps for OSLC OP Specifications
Wow, it took 3 hours for this email to hit the list! What’s wrong with this mailing list?
--
/Andrew
(from phone)
|
|
Re: Next steps for OSLC OP Specifications
And this wow message itself took just under 8h...
--
/Andrew
(from phone)
|
|
OSLC Specs Search
Hi,
I have set up a Custom Google Search engine over our specs: https://forum.open-services.net/t/oslc-specs-search/275 -- –Andrew.
|
|
Re: OSLC Specs Search
Very Cool!!
Thanks for doing this. -- Jim Amsden, Senior Technical Staff Member ELM Quality Manager 919-525-6575 From: "Andrii Berezovskyi" <andriib@...> To: "oslc-op@..." <oslc-op@...> Date: 06/28/2019 08:40 AM Subject: [EXTERNAL] [oslc-op] OSLC Specs Search Sent by: oslc-op@... Hi, I have set up a Custom Google Search engine over our specs: https://forum.open-services.net/t/oslc-specs-search/275 -- –Andrew.
|
|
Re: AA warning on the RM 2.1 CSPRD01
Chet Ensign
Whoops. Thanks for that catch. We add that file briefly while we are QA'ing files after copying them from our staging server. We remove it before announcing the publication to everyone. Looks like we missed that step on this file. Paul, can you remove that please? Again, thanks... /chet
On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 5:47 PM Andrii Berezovskyi <andriib@...> wrote: Hello Chet, --
/chet ---------------- Chet Ensign Chief Technical Community Steward OASIS: Advancing open standards for the information society http://www.oasis-open.org Mobile: +1 201-341-1393
|
|
Re: Submitting the Quality Management Open Project Specification for public review
Chet Ensign
Slowly but surely, I am getting oriented to where we are and catching up... On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 5:48 PM Andrii Berezovskyi <andriib@...> wrote:
The OP rules do not require that so yes, that is fine.
Correct. And approving it as PSD04 is fine.
Right, no approval needed from us. By 'designated branch' we were trying to say, basically, you should approve a labeled branch that people can get back to later if they want to review the evolution of the TC work product.
Correct.
That is certainly a good way to do it process-wise. But personally, I wouldn't rule out that you might get good comments via the email list.
That is fine - your call.
Yes, I have been working my way through the discussions. I definitely have some questions to discuss with you there. Will get those thoughts together today.
/chet ---------------- Chet Ensign Chief Technical Community Steward OASIS: Advancing open standards for the information society http://www.oasis-open.org Mobile: +1 201-341-1393
|
|