Hello, I am glad to submit finished OSLC 2020 Reference Implementation for your review and approval following the work we've done under the PGB

Hi, Did anyone hear about https://github.com/ld4mbse/oslc4tdb before? Seems like something new Axel and Mario are working on. Axel, will be glad to see a demo and discuss when you are ready!

The URI for a singleresource with parameterized results could be one with the query stringincluded - this might be appropriate if the response was repeatable forthe same query string. Or it could be a

I considered using an OSLC Query. The problem though is that the response is a query result. So the client cannot simply link to that. It needs to get it’s first member (The client knows that the

Hi David I am afraid that an agnostic approach in the primer may make the primer as generic as the specs. One suggestion would be to take one specific versioning model, and demonstrate the specs

It seems that followingOSLC Query here might be appropriate if the resources in question are akey part of your application. But if you wanta lighter-weight solution, I see nothing in OSLC that

Hi It would be appreciated to hear from the OSLC experts, if you have any advice on this topic https://forum.open-services.net/t/handling-a-get-request-that-depends-on-client-paramters/424

I don't think thatthe OSLC Configuration Management specification makes any statements abouthow versioning is implemented, whether parallel versioning is supported,how merging of parallels might be

Hej David started, and I merged some initial content on the CCM Primer we started discussing on Thursday. https://github.com/oslc-op/oslc-specs/blob/master/notes/ccm-primer/ccm-primer.md It

Jim Concerning theSysML v2 OSLC PSM, I was at the call today. The current Sysml specs only covers basic versioning, but they do seem have plans to have a more complete Config. Specs. (Not

Yep, I see no problem with that. I'll revisit those parts of the rules but I see nothing to block you producing Project Notes the same as a Committee Note from a TC. /chet -- /chet

Hello, The OSLC Core Version 3.0 Project Specification 01 represents a milestone in the standardization process for open-services.net specifications. This revision incorporates the insight gained

Hello, The OSLC Change Management Version 3.0 Project Specification 01 represents a milestone in the standardization process for open-services.net specifications. This revision incorporates the

Hello, The OSLC Requirements Management Version 2.1 Project Specification 01 represents a milestone in the standardization process for open-services.net specifications. This revision incorporates the

Hello, The OSLC Quality Management Version 2.1 Project Specification 01 represents a milestone in the standardization process for open-services.net specifications. This revision incorporates the

Hello Chet, Can the OP release an OP note similar to https://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-primer/ without going through PSD..OS process? I think we have such flag in ReSpec but no mention of it under

oslc-op Weekly Contributors Meeting When: Thursday, 29 October 2020 10:00am to 11:00am (GMT-04:00) America/New York Where: https://meet.jit.si/oslc-op Organizer: jamsden@... Description: oslc-op

Due to time change, the oslc-op call overlaps with customer calls, same with the SysML Track 5 call. My status: I have made some progress on updating the automation spec. I will split the vocab and

Hej I can’t yet see the changes under “contribute”. Don’t like TimBL’s photo? You can use mine. For the meetings, I haven’t seen an “invite” since we moved to OP. If there is a

Hello, Jad, good catch! I have done the updates to the page: https://github.com/oslc-op/website/commits/master. I also updated the text a bit on https://open-services.net/contribute/ under "Working