Minutes:https://github.com/oslc-op/oasis-open-project/blob/master/minutes/2022/2022-05-26.md /Andrew From:<oslc-op@...> on behalf of Group Notification <noreply@...> Reply-To: "oslc-op@..."

Following the discussion today, please find attached the spreadsheet with the updates made during the call. The profiles in the second sheet are described

oslc-op Weekly Contributors Meeting When: 06/09/2022 10:00am to 11:00am (UTC-04:00) America/New York Where: https://meet.jit.si/oslc-op Organizer: Jim Amsden jamsden@... View

OASIS members and other interested parties, We are pleased to announce that OSLC PROMCODE v1.0 Errata 01 from the OSLC PROMCODE TC is now an Approved Errata. This document lists errata for the OASIS

Hi all, As usual, we will rely on the OSLC OP team to prepare the PS01 HTML and TTL files for Configuration Management v1.0. I will provide quality review as needed and handle preparation of the PDF

oslc-op Weekly Contributors Meeting When: 06/02/2022 10:00am to 11:00am (UTC-04:00) America/New York Where: https://meet.jit.si/oslc-op Organizer: Jim Amsden jamsden@... View

hi I will also be away today. ______________________________ Jad El-khoury, PhD KTH Royal Institute of Technology School of Industrial Engineering and Management, Mechatronics

Thu 2nd June is a UK public holiday, so I won’t be attending the OSLC OP meeting. I will look at this next week. From: Eran Gery <eran.gery@...> Sent: 01 June 2022 10:14 To: David Honey2

David Can you please look up the link storage/discovery tables I sent and confirm? These tables are a practical basis to discuss the linking profile. Would be great if you can do before

Participants in the OSLC Open Project, The ballot to approve OSLC Configuration Management Version 1.0 PSD01 as a Project Specification, found in

Your name:

Hi, I will attend an off-site project meeting on Thursday and won’t be able to join the OP call. Please make sure to have someone take minutes. /Andrew

Well IBM/ELM/Jazz has a discovery namespace: http://jazz.net/xmlns/prod/jazz/discovery/1.0/ This was developed after 3.x because it of perceived architectural limitations of the rootservices. But

Could someone refresh my memory on what xmlns:oslc_disc=“http://open-services.net/xmlns/discovery/1.0/” is and when was it deprecated, please? /A Begin forwarded message: From:OSLC forum

Sorry I should have been more careful with my vocabulary. I meant reify in generic sense not in an RDF sense. I meant to formalize what we mean by and expect from links – and indeed we already

Hi Eran, Yes OSLC query for opt out makes sense, and it’s straight forward. we should discuss. From: Eran Gery <eran.gery@...> Sent: Freitag, 27. Mai 2022 10:30 To: Gentry, Edward

A few ideas and observations and a concrete proposal: A helpful idea was proposed by our French Sodius Colleague whose name escapes me. He suggested in a conversation after our last call – and

I do have one concern about Jim’s inverse link suggestion (though I generally think it’s a good idea). Implementing inverse links is more significant implementation work for IBM ELM. All

Re:We should reify the concept of link beyond just a single predicate OSLC avoids and discourages the use ofreification. It can make querying problematic, especially for OSLC query. I don’t think

As you suggest Jim, we could add a new property of an oslc:Property to indicate the reverse predicate for a link. This is not without its problems. Say we added aoslc:inversePropertyDefinition