Chet, There are twoproblems with the OASIS Latest version URL for Open Project documents.Here's an example from the OSLC Change Management 3.0 specification: Latest version:

Nick, Is this the lowest level of SC strictness? I don’t like that every build is

Could you please publish them on oslc-admin as previous minutes? HackMD is just a temp editing place. -- –Andrew. Från:<oslc-op@...> på uppdrag av Jim Amsden <jamsden@...> Svara till:

See https://hackmd.io/GBxx8iRLS3Sf-VvZM2z1Dw?view -- Jim Amsden, SeniorTechnical Staff Member ELM Quality Manager 919-525-6575

I can join a short call next week. -- –Andrew. Från:<oslc-op@...> på uppdrag av Chet Ensign <chet.ensign@...> Svara till: "oslc-op@..." <oslc-op@...>, "chet.ensign@..."

Nick, All good points.Comments embedded below, and I've removed the ones that have no commentsfor clarity... -- Jim Amsden, SeniorTechnical Staff Member ELM Quality Manager 919-525-6575 From:

Some comments onthe numbered issues in the agenda, for discussion tomorrow: 1. OP ProjectSpecification format and OASIS boilerplate OK. 2. Where OP specificationsare published Where OASIS

Hey Jim, Paul and I are in staff and board meetings this week but on the issue of finalizing the template/style sheets, how about we get on a call together next week and walk through all the remaining

All, I am pleased to announce the winners of the 2019 Open Standards Cup. We had a number of deserving projects and standards this year and all are truly deserving of recognition and applause. 2019

Meeting agenda: https://hackmd.io/GBxx8iRLS3Sf-VvZM2z1Dw?view -- Jim Amsden, SeniorTechnical Staff Member ELM Quality Manager 919-525-6575

I have reviewed Andrew'spull request for ReSpec changes to URI generation, and merged it with myown changes into master (ReSpec 2.1.4). In doing so, I have restored thehandling of previousMaturity and

Hi, Please find the minutes from today here: https://github.com/oslc-op/oslc-admin/blob/master/minutes/2019/2019-07-18.md Please add agenda items for the next meeting

There is an OMG effort to define the SysML v2 API which mentions OSLC. I'm nota familiar with the API4KB working group. I'm familiar with ISO_15926. It is used a lot in Norway in combination with

Hi, Is this the OMG effort to define APIs? Because OSLC is not even in the list of references there. Also, did anyone hear about https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_15926? -- –Andrew.

Hi I will be on holidays until mid-august so will have limited time to attend the telcos. But I hope I can find time to respond to actions via email. regards ______________________________ Jad

Hi, After the call with Chet, Jim, and Nick today I tried my chances with JS by editing ReSpec and tried the results out on the RM spec (sorry Jad :D). Please find attached two rendered specs for the

I agree - but I amout on vacation from now until Tuesday July 16th. I cannot see itas desirable for the 'authoritative' link that readers will use to readthe current standard appear as the

Let’s set up a meeting! -- /Andrew (from phone) On Wed, Jul 3, 2019 at 6:52 PM +0200, "Jim Amsden" <jamsden@...> wrote:

We discussed usingThis version: https://github.com/oslc-op/oslc-specs/blob/cm-v3.0-psd01/specs/cm/change-mgt-spec.html(Authoritative) with Chet and he feels it is preferred that the

I agree with Andrew. We cannot usethe URIs Jim suggests for the authoritative 'this' version - https://github.com/oslc-op/oslc-specs/blob/cm-v3.0-psd01/specs/cm/change-mgt-spec.html- it does not even