|
Incorporating open-services.net site maintenance into oslc-op
8 messages
#poll
A new poll has been created: Should we migrate the site sources under oslc-op/oslc-website? The oslc-op PGB has already decided to act as the governing body for open-services.net. So it makes sense to
A new poll has been created: Should we migrate the site sources under oslc-op/oslc-website? The oslc-op PGB has already decided to act as the governing body for open-services.net. So it makes sense to
|
By
Jim Amsden
·
|
|
Submit OSLC CM 2.1 for publishing as PSD03
The ballot has passed. Vote tally is available under https://lists.oasis-open-projects.org/g/oslc-op-pgb/responses?pollid=6453 (screenshot attached) Cheers, Andrew
The ballot has passed. Vote tally is available under https://lists.oasis-open-projects.org/g/oslc-op-pgb/responses?pollid=6453 (screenshot attached) Cheers, Andrew
|
By
Andrii Berezovskyi
·
|
|
[oslc-core] The OSLC TCs and Member Section will close this Friday
Hello, I would like to thank everyone for their participation in the member section & StC and the tech committees! The newly formed OSLC Open Project had a busy summer and the OSLC Project Governing B
Hello, I would like to thank everyone for their participation in the member section & StC and the tech committees! The newly formed OSLC Open Project had a busy summer and the OSLC Project Governing B
|
By
Andrii Berezovskyi
·
|
|
The OSLC TCs and Member Section will close this Friday
The work of the OSLC Technical Committees and Member Section have transitioned successfully to the OASIS OSLC Open Project. The time has come to congratulate everyone on the progress made and close th
The work of the OSLC Technical Committees and Member Section have transitioned successfully to the OASIS OSLC Open Project. The time has come to congratulate everyone on the progress made and close th
|
By
Chet Ensign
·
|
|
[oslc-op] The PDB has approved to publish CM 3.0 PSD03
Thanks Jim! Yay, the first approved document by the PGB 🎉 A small correction: the ballot will request the PGB to promote PSD03 to PS03. -- –Andrew. Från: <oslc-op@...> på uppdrag av Jim Amsden <jamsde
Thanks Jim! Yay, the first approved document by the PGB 🎉 A small correction: the ballot will request the PGB to promote PSD03 to PS03. -- –Andrew. Från: <oslc-op@...> på uppdrag av Jim Amsden <jamsde
|
By
Andrii Berezovskyi
·
|
|
What's next for publishing oslc-op specifications
We are finally getting the remaining ReSpec changes done in order to be able to render HTML for the oslc-op specifications. Thanks to Nick and Andrew for all the work they've contributed to this impor
We are finally getting the remaining ReSpec changes done in order to be able to render HTML for the oslc-op specifications. Thanks to Nick and Andrew for all the work they've contributed to this impor
|
By
Jim Amsden
·
|
|
Submit OSLC CM 2.1 for publishing as PSD03
5 messages
What is eaxtly OSLC CM2.1? Can you share a link to the document? CM = change management or configuration management?
What is eaxtly OSLC CM2.1? Can you share a link to the document? CM = change management or configuration management?
|
By
Axel Reichwein
·
|
|
Submit OSLC CM 2.1 for publishing as PSD03
#poll
Thanks Jim, I have just cast my vote. The PGB has 14 days to approve the current WD as the PSD03. Please cast your votes too! -- –Andrew. Från: <oslc-op-pgb@...> på uppdrag av Jim Amsden <jamsden@...>
Thanks Jim, I have just cast my vote. The PGB has 14 days to approve the current WD as the PSD03. Please cast your votes too! -- –Andrew. Från: <oslc-op-pgb@...> på uppdrag av Jim Amsden <jamsden@...>
|
By
Andrii Berezovskyi
·
|
|
Submit OSLC CM 3.0 for publishing as PSD03
#poll
A new poll has been created: Do the OSLC PGB members approve publishing OSLC CM2.1 revision 03 as PSD03? 1. Yes, approve pubublishing 2. No, needs more work Vote Now
A new poll has been created: Do the OSLC PGB members approve publishing OSLC CM2.1 revision 03 as PSD03? 1. Yes, approve pubublishing 2. No, needs more work Vote Now
|
By
Jim Amsden
·
|
|
Test
3 messages
Did you all get this email? -- /Andrew (from phone)
Did you all get this email? -- /Andrew (from phone)
|
By
Andrii Berezovskyi
·
|
|
[OSLC/oslc-site-hugo] Migrate to the OP? (#245)
Jim, I agree that we should keep PGB in the loop on all major decisions but I don’t think we should require the project to wait for the next PGB meeting to sort urgent tech and org issues out, such as
Jim, I agree that we should keep PGB in the loop on all major decisions but I don’t think we should require the project to wait for the next PGB meeting to sort urgent tech and org issues out, such as
|
By
Andrii Berezovskyi
·
|
|
Submitting the Quality Management Open Project Specification for public review
3 messages
Thanks a lot, Chet! I want to make sure I got this right, so let me make some comments and please correct me if I got this wrong in any way: 1) We are not submitting a spec for public review. Instead,
Thanks a lot, Chet! I want to make sure I got this right, so let me make some comments and please correct me if I got this wrong in any way: 1) We are not submitting a spec for public review. Instead,
|
By
Andrii Berezovskyi
·
|
|
Welcome to the oslc-op-pgb mailing list
Welcome to the OASIS OSLC Open Project PGB mailing list. This list is for the use of the members of the Project Governing Board and can be used to send questions and comments to their attention. This
Welcome to the OASIS OSLC Open Project PGB mailing list. This list is for the use of the members of the Project Governing Board and can be used to send questions and comments to their attention. This
|
By
Chet Ensign
·
|