Date
1 - 12 of 12
Locked Approve OSLC Architecture Management Specification Version 3.0 as a Project Specification #poll-result #poll-notice
|
Do you approve Architecture Management Specification Version 3.0 [1] becoming Project Specification 01?
The ballot opens 24 September 2021 at 00:00 UTC and closes 30 September 2021 at 23:59 UTC. Please indicate your selection using the buttons below.
This ballot requires a Special Majority Vote [2]. The PGB roster currently lists 3 voting members. In order to pass, at least 2 <2/3 x 3> members have to vote Yes and no more than 1 <1/4 x 3> members may vote No.
Eligible voting members are:
Jim Amsden (IBM)
Andrew Berezovskyi (KTH Royal Institute of Technology)
Axel Reichwein (Koneksys)
If you do not see your name on this list and you believe this to be an error, please notify the Chairs and me so that we can address the situation.
[1] URI for the specification
https://github.com/oslc-op/oslc-specs/releases/download/untagged-d0f98fd75ea23ea3dcfb/am-v3.0-ps01.zip
(Note that the specification was edited on Sept. 27 in a way which broke the link , after the poll was started, so a current link to the specification is: - https://github.com/oslc-op/oslc-specs/releases/download/untagged-160cc02303316aa81b28/am-v3.0-ps01.zip )
Additional edits were made on Sept. 30. The newest ZIP file is: - https://github.com/oslc-op/oslc-specs/releases/download/untagged-007e3ded26e59430e0dc/am-v3.0-ps01.zip The changes made on Sept. 27 can be viewed at: - https://github.com/oslc-op/oslc-specs/commit/60f4cff8af3c03f9b21d65b21fe4cf09725ff611 Jim Amsden described the changes made on Sept. 30: - "This fixes one broken link and two anchors that had the incorrect id. No other changes." [2] https://www.oasis-open.org/policies-guidelines/open-projects-process/#project-specifications-approval-criteria
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Jim, Paul, The link in the ballot is broken. I assume https://github.com/oslc-op/oslc-specs/releases/download/untagged-160cc02303316aa81b28/am-v3.0-ps01.zip is a link to the same contents. –Andrew |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Chet Ensign
Thanks Andrew - I'm not sure how that happened but I see what you mean. Paul, you should be able to edit the poll to add a note correcting the reference. I don't think we have to start the ballot over. Click the hamburger icon with More at the bottom of the page. /chet On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 9:18 AM Andrii Berezovskyi <andriib@...> wrote:
--
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Jim, Part 1 has a broken link: 1) [OSLCShapes] Arthur Ryman; Jim Amsden. OSLC Core Version 3.0. Part 6: Resource Shape 404. OASIS. Project Specification Draft. URL: https://docs.oasis-open-projects.org/oslc-op/core/v3.0/resource-shapes.html Part 3 has broken anchors which makes correct content negotiation not possible (case-sensitive): 2) architecture-management-shapes.html#Resource 3) architecture-management-shapes.html#LinkType Provided that OASIS admin allows you to fix these issues before publication, I am voting YES. –Andrew. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Paul, The same issue just happened again. You created the poll just before I attached a new zip with a new URL. Sorry for the confusion. Can you update the poll? -----oslc-op-pgb@... wrote: ----- To: oslc-op-pgb@... From: "Paul Knight" Sent by: oslc-op-pgb@... Date: 09/30/2021 12:18PM Subject: [EXTERNAL] [oslc-op-pgb] Approve OSLC Architecture Management Specification Version 3.0 as a Project Specification #poll-notice [Edited Message Follows] A poll has been updated: Do you approve Architecture Management Specification Version 3.0 [1] becoming Project Specification 01? The ballot opens 24 September 2021 at 00:00 UTC and closes 30 September 2021 at 23:59 ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart This Message Is From an External Sender
This message came from outside your organization.
[Edited Message Follows] A poll has been updated: Do you approve Architecture Management Specification Version 3.0 [1] becoming Project Specification 01? The ballot opens 24 September 2021 at 00:00 UTC and closes 30 September 2021 at 23:59 UTC. Please indicate your selection using the buttons below. This ballot requires a Special Majority Vote [2]. The PGB roster currently lists 3 voting members. In order to pass, at least 2 <2/3 x 3> members have to vote Yes and no more than 1 <1/4 x 3> members may vote No. Eligible voting members are: Jim Amsden (IBM) Andrew Berezovskyi (KTH Royal Institute of Technology) Axel Reichwein (Koneksys) If you do not see your name on this list and you believe this to be an error, please notify the Chairs and me so that we can address the situation. [1] URI for the specification https://github.com/oslc-op/oslc-specs/releases/download/untagged-d0f98fd75ea23ea3dcfb/am-v3.0-ps01.zip (Note that the specification was edited on Sept. 27 in a way which broke the link , after the poll was started, so a current link to the specification is: - https://github.com/oslc-op/oslc-specs/releases/download/untagged-160cc02303316aa81b28/am-v3.0-ps01.zip The changes made on Sept. 27 can be viewed at: - https://github.com/oslc-op/oslc-specs/commit/60f4cff8af3c03f9b21d65b21fe4cf09725ff611
1. Yes Do not reply to this message to vote in the poll. You can vote in polls only through the group's website. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Paul Knight
Done... On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 2:18 PM Jim Amsden <jamsden@...> wrote:
--
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Chet Ensign
Jim, these are not material changes, right? Just editorial, non-material fixes? On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 2:18 PM Jim Amsden <jamsden@...> wrote:
--
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Yes, Chet, these are very minor fixes, mostly links. -----"Chet Ensign" <chet.ensign@...> wrote: ----- To: oslc-op-pgb@..., "Jim Amsden" <jamsden@...> From: "Chet Ensign" <chet.ensign@...> Date: 09/30/2021 03:04PM Cc: "Paul Knight" <paul.knight@...> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [oslc-op-pgb] Approve OSLC Architecture Management Specification Version 3.0 as a Project Specification #poll-notice Jim, these are not material changes, right? Just editorial, non-material fixes? On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 2:18 PM Jim Amsden <jamsden@...> wrote: Paul, The same issue just happened again. You created the poll just before I attached ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart This Message Is From an External Sender
This message came from outside your organization.
Jim, these are not material changes, right? Just editorial, non-material fixes? On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 2:18 PM Jim Amsden <jamsden@...> wrote:
--
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Chet Ensign
Ok, thanks. On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 4:38 PM Jim Amsden <jamsden@...> wrote:
--
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Chet Ensign
Jim/Andrew - can you confirm that https://github.com/oslc-op/oslc-specs/releases/download/untagged-007e3ded26e59430e0dc/am-v3.0-ps01.zip is the final, approved version to be published?
Thanks, /chet |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
-----oslc-op-pgb@... wrote: ----- To: "Chet Ensign" <chet.ensign@...>, oslc-op-pgb@... From: "Chet Ensign" Sent by: oslc-op-pgb@... Date: 10/05/2021 01:03PM Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [oslc-op-pgb] Approve OSLC Architecture Management Specification Version 3.0 as a Project Specification #poll-notice Jim/Andrew - can you confirm that https://github.com/oslc-op/oslc-specs/releases/download/untagged-007e3ded26e59430e0dc/am-v3.0-ps01.zip is the final, approved version to be published? Thanks, /chet ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart This Message Is From an External Sender
This message came from outside your organization.
Jim/Andrew - can you confirm that https://github.com/oslc-op/oslc-specs/releases/download/untagged-007e3ded26e59430e0dc/am-v3.0-ps01.zip is the final, approved version to be published? Thanks, /chet |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Chet Ensign
Thanks. On Tue, Oct 5, 2021 at 1:09 PM Jim Amsden <jamsden@...> wrote:
--
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
