|
[OASIS Issue Tracker] (TCADMIN-3919) Publish OSLC Requirements Management Version 2.1 PS01 as a candidate for OASIS Standard
I though Paul was ok with these changes. Can we verify? -----oslc-op-pgb@... wrote: ----- To: "oslc-op-pgb@..." <oslc-op-pgb@...
|
I though Paul was ok with these changes. Can we verify? -----oslc-op-pgb@... wrote: ----- To: "oslc-op-pgb@..." <oslc-op-pgb@...
|
By
Jim Amsden
· #122
·
|
|
IBM Statements of Use for OASIS OSLC Core, CM, RM and AM Specifications
IBM is pleased to provide statements of use to the following OASIS OSLC Open Project specifications. IBM Statements of use: for OSLC Core Version 3.0 Project Specification IBM has successfully impleme
|
IBM is pleased to provide statements of use to the following OASIS OSLC Open Project specifications. IBM Statements of use: for OSLC Core Version 3.0 Project Specification IBM has successfully impleme
|
By
Jim Amsden
· #96
·
|
|
Balot result: OSLC Query Version 3.0 PSD 01 ballot
PGB members, This is to inform you that ballot: OSLC Query Version 3.0 PSD 01 ballotwas approved by a vote of 2 yes, 0 no. We will be proceeding with publishing PSD01 of this document with publication
|
PGB members, This is to inform you that ballot: OSLC Query Version 3.0 PSD 01 ballotwas approved by a vote of 2 yes, 0 no. We will be proceeding with publishing PSD01 of this document with publication
|
By
Jim Amsden
· #65
·
|
|
On the migration of OASIS OSLC PROMCODE TC to OSLC Open Project
I don't really see the benefit. Moving to an open project will require a lot of administrative and document template changes and may not create any new value. PROMCODE could be considered an OSLC doma
|
I don't really see the benefit. Moving to an open project will require a lot of administrative and document template changes and may not create any new value. PROMCODE could be considered an OSLC doma
|
By
Jim Amsden
· #48
·
|
|
OSLC Core 3.0 PSD04 Ballot Passed
The Publish OSLC Core 3.0 PSD04 ballot (https://lists.oasis-open-projects.org/g/oslc-op-pgb/topic/publish_oslc_core_3_0_psd04/68279389?p=,,,20,0,0,0::recentpostdate%2Fsticky,,,20,2,0,68279389) passed
|
The Publish OSLC Core 3.0 PSD04 ballot (https://lists.oasis-open-projects.org/g/oslc-op-pgb/topic/publish_oslc_core_3_0_psd04/68279389?p=,,,20,0,0,0::recentpostdate%2Fsticky,,,20,2,0,68279389) passed
|
By
Jim Amsden
· #47
·
|
|
Publish OSLC Core 3.0 PSD04 ballot
#poll
A new poll has been created: Do the PGB members approve publishing OSLC Core 3.0 as PSD04? Release materials are located under https://github.com/oslc-op/oslc-specs/releases The ballot opens immediate
|
A new poll has been created: Do the PGB members approve publishing OSLC Core 3.0 as PSD04? Release materials are located under https://github.com/oslc-op/oslc-specs/releases The ballot opens immediate
|
By
Jim Amsden
· #46
·
|
|
Formal notice of intent to publish OSLC Core 3.0 PSD04
Dear OSLC PGB members, The rules require us to notify you at least 14 days before submitting the ballots for the spec drafts publication. We are hereby notifying you of the OP intention to publish OSL
|
Dear OSLC PGB members, The rules require us to notify you at least 14 days before submitting the ballots for the spec drafts publication. We are hereby notifying you of the OP intention to publish OSL
|
By
Jim Amsden
· #45
·
|
|
What's next for publishing oslc-op specifications
We are finally getting the remaining ReSpec changes done in order to be able to render HTML for the oslc-op specifications. Thanks to Nick and Andrew for all the work they've contributed to this impor
|
We are finally getting the remaining ReSpec changes done in order to be able to render HTML for the oslc-op specifications. Thanks to Nick and Andrew for all the work they've contributed to this impor
|
By
Jim Amsden
· #23
·
|
|
Submit OSLC CM 3.0 for publishing as PSD03
#poll
A new poll has been created: Do the OSLC PGB members approve publishing OSLC CM2.1 revision 03 as PSD03? 1. Yes, approve pubublishing 2. No, needs more work Vote Now
|
A new poll has been created: Do the OSLC PGB members approve publishing OSLC CM2.1 revision 03 as PSD03? 1. Yes, approve pubublishing 2. No, needs more work Vote Now
|
By
Jim Amsden
· #16
·
|
|
Incorporating open-services.net site maintenance into oslc-op
#poll
Chet, Is this new template in https://github.com/oslc-op/oslc-admin. If so, I don't think the PFB members are subscribed to these issues and won't be notified of the ballot. Same with https://github.c
|
Chet, Is this new template in https://github.com/oslc-op/oslc-admin. If so, I don't think the PFB members are subscribed to these issues and won't be notified of the ballot. Same with https://github.c
|
By
Jim Amsden
· #15
·
|
|
Incorporating open-services.net site maintenance into oslc-op
#poll
A new poll has been created: Should we migrate the site sources under oslc-op/oslc-website? The oslc-op PGB has already decided to act as the governing body for open-services.net. So it makes sense to
|
A new poll has been created: Should we migrate the site sources under oslc-op/oslc-website? The oslc-op PGB has already decided to act as the governing body for open-services.net. So it makes sense to
|
By
Jim Amsden
· #9
·
|
