PGB members, This is to inform you that ballot: OSLC Query Version 3.0 PSD 01 ballotwas approved by a vote of 2 yes, 0 no. We will be proceeding with publishing PSD01 of this document with publication

I don't really see the benefit. Moving to an open project will require a lot of administrative and document template changes and may not create any new value. PROMCODE could be considered an OSLC doma

The Publish OSLC Core 3.0 PSD04 ballot (https://lists.oasis-open-projects.org/g/oslc-op-pgb/topic/publish_oslc_core_3_0_psd04/68279389?p=,,,20,0,0,0::recentpostdate%2Fsticky,,,20,2,0,68279389) passed

A new poll has been created: Do the PGB members approve publishing OSLC Core 3.0 as PSD04? Release materials are located under https://github.com/oslc-op/oslc-specs/releases The ballot opens immediate

#poll

Dear OSLC PGB members, The rules require us to notify you at least 14 days before submitting the ballots for the spec drafts publication. We are hereby notifying you of the OP intention to publish OSL

We are finally getting the remaining ReSpec changes done in order to be able to render HTML for the oslc-op specifications. Thanks to Nick and Andrew for all the work they've contributed to this impor

A new poll has been created: Do the OSLC PGB members approve publishing OSLC CM2.1 revision 03 as PSD03? 1. Yes, approve pubublishing 2. No, needs more work Vote Now

#poll

Chet, Is this new template in https://github.com/oslc-op/oslc-admin. If so, I don't think the PFB members are subscribed to these issues and won't be notified of the ballot. Same with https://github.c

#poll

A new poll has been created: Should we migrate the site sources under oslc-op/oslc-website? The oslc-op PGB has already decided to act as the governing body for open-services.net. So it makes sense to

#poll