|
The ballot to approve OSLC Core Version 3.0 as Project Specification 02 has passed
Members of the OSLC OP,
The Special Majority ballot to approve OSLC Core Version 3.0 as Project Specification 02 has closed and passed. You can find the ballot result at
Members of the OSLC OP,
The Special Majority ballot to approve OSLC Core Version 3.0 as Project Specification 02 has closed and passed. You can find the ballot result at
|
By
Chet Ensign
·
#134
·
|
|
locked
Approve OSLC Core Version 3.0 as a Project Specification
#poll-notice
#poll-result
By
Chet Ensign
·
#133
·
|
|
Formal notice of intent to publish OSLC Core 3.0 PS 02
Dear PGB members,
The rules require us to notify you at least 14 days before submitting the ballots for the spec drafts publication. We are hereby notifying you of the OP intention to publish OSLC
Dear PGB members,
The rules require us to notify you at least 14 days before submitting the ballots for the spec drafts publication. We are hereby notifying you of the OP intention to publish OSLC
|
By
Andrii Berezovskyi
·
#132
·
|
|
Re: [oslc-op] [OASIS Issue Tracker] (TCADMIN-3919) Publish OSLC Requirements Management Version 2.1 PS01 as a candidate for OASIS Standard
Andrew, I just went with the oslc-op@ main mailing list. Let's see how this works out in practice.
I think the collecting of comments is a topic that will benefit from some experimentation. So we're
Andrew, I just went with the oslc-op@ main mailing list. Let's see how this works out in practice.
I think the collecting of comments is a topic that will benefit from some experimentation. So we're
|
By
Chet Ensign
·
#131
·
|
|
Re: [oslc-op] [OASIS Issue Tracker] (TCADMIN-3919) Publish OSLC Requirements Management Version 2.1 PS01 as a candidate for OASIS Standard
"We'll address that in the next Version", nice addition to my co-chair vocabulary :D
Regarding public comments, https://www.oasis-open.org/oasis-open-projects-handbook/ specifies that anyone with a GH
"We'll address that in the next Version", nice addition to my co-chair vocabulary :D
Regarding public comments, https://www.oasis-open.org/oasis-open-projects-handbook/ specifies that anyone with a GH
|
By
Andrii Berezovskyi
·
#130
·
|
|
Re: [oslc-op] [OASIS Issue Tracker] (TCADMIN-3919) Publish OSLC Requirements Management Version 2.1 PS01 as a candidate for OASIS Standard
Hi Andrew and all,
I do hope we can start the public reviews tomorrow, although there is still some question (apparently rule interpretations are involved) about how to handle the public comment
Hi Andrew and all,
I do hope we can start the public reviews tomorrow, although there is still some question (apparently rule interpretations are involved) about how to handle the public comment
|
By
Paul Knight
·
#129
·
|
|
Re: [oslc-op] [OASIS Issue Tracker] (TCADMIN-3919) Publish OSLC Requirements Management Version 2.1 PS01 as a candidate for OASIS Standard
Hello Paul,
Great, let's start the public review tomorrow then. Thank you for all the hard work!
I am assuming Jim is also onboard given that we found a way forward without any delays. Also, nice to
Hello Paul,
Great, let's start the public review tomorrow then. Thank you for all the hard work!
I am assuming Jim is also onboard given that we found a way forward without any delays. Also, nice to
|
By
Andrii Berezovskyi
·
#128
·
|
|
Re: [oslc-op] [OASIS Issue Tracker] (TCADMIN-3919) Publish OSLC Requirements Management Version 2.1 PS01 as a candidate for OASIS Standard
Hi all,
Sounds like a good resolution here.
Just a couple of clarifications:
- I have no objections to any of the changes (in
Hi all,
Sounds like a good resolution here.
Just a couple of clarifications:
- I have no objections to any of the changes (in
|
By
Paul Knight
·
#127
·
|
|
Re: [oslc-op] [OASIS Issue Tracker] (TCADMIN-3919) Publish OSLC Requirements Management Version 2.1 PS01 as a candidate for OASIS Standard
I'm ok with the proposal.
Best regards,
Axel
I'm ok with the proposal.
Best regards,
Axel
|
By
Axel Reichwein
·
#126
·
|
|
Re: [oslc-op] [OASIS Issue Tracker] (TCADMIN-3919) Publish OSLC Requirements Management Version 2.1 PS01 as a candidate for OASIS Standard
Thank you, Chet!
--
Cheers,
Andrew
Thank you, Chet!
--
Cheers,
Andrew
|
By
Andrii Berezovskyi
·
#125
·
|
|
Re: [oslc-op] [OASIS Issue Tracker] (TCADMIN-3919) Publish OSLC Requirements Management Version 2.1 PS01 as a candidate for OASIS Standard
Correct. I agreed that the changes are non-material. I just didn't take the time to think through the implications of how to handle that in the ballot.
Andrew, what I mean is that the current PS01
Correct. I agreed that the changes are non-material. I just didn't take the time to think through the implications of how to handle that in the ballot.
Andrew, what I mean is that the current PS01
|
By
Chet Ensign
·
#124
·
|
|
Re: [oslc-op] [OASIS Issue Tracker] (TCADMIN-3919) Publish OSLC Requirements Management Version 2.1 PS01 as a candidate for OASIS Standard
Hello Chet,
I am happy with the plan, sounds like a good way to kill two birds with one stone, esp. if some non-material changes will be requested during the review and we will need to make minor
Hello Chet,
I am happy with the plan, sounds like a good way to kill two birds with one stone, esp. if some non-material changes will be requested during the review and we will need to make minor
|
By
Andrii Berezovskyi
·
#123
·
|
|
Re: [OASIS Issue Tracker] (TCADMIN-3919) Publish OSLC Requirements Management Version 2.1 PS01 as a candidate for OASIS Standard
I though Paul was ok with these changes. Can we verify?
-----oslc-op-pgb@... wrote: -----
To: "oslc-op-pgb@..." <oslc-op-pgb@...>
From: "Andrii Berezovskyi"
Sent by: oslc-op-pgb@...
Date: 03/08/2021
I though Paul was ok with these changes. Can we verify?
-----oslc-op-pgb@... wrote: -----
To: "oslc-op-pgb@..." <oslc-op-pgb@...>
From: "Andrii Berezovskyi"
Sent by: oslc-op-pgb@...
Date: 03/08/2021
|
By
Jim Amsden
·
#122
·
|
|
Re: [oslc-op] [OASIS Issue Tracker] (TCADMIN-3919) Publish OSLC Requirements Management Version 2.1 PS01 as a candidate for OASIS Standard
Hi guys -
Sorry. Paul is right. I goofed on the ballot but here is an alternative way forward.
I should not have used the link to the email attachment -
Hi guys -
Sorry. Paul is right. I goofed on the ballot but here is an alternative way forward.
I should not have used the link to the email attachment -
|
By
Chet Ensign
·
#121
·
|
|
Re: [oslc-op] [OASIS Issue Tracker] (TCADMIN-3919) Publish OSLC Requirements Management Version 2.1 PS01 as a candidate for OASIS Standard
Hello Andrew,
I agree with whatever you think is the best.
Best regards,
Axel
Hello Andrew,
I agree with whatever you think is the best.
Best regards,
Axel
|
By
Axel Reichwein
·
#120
·
|
|
[OASIS Issue Tracker] (TCADMIN-3919) Publish OSLC Requirements Management Version 2.1 PS01 as a candidate for OASIS Standard
Hello Axel, Jim,
The CM COS is proceeding as usual but the RM COS is in a bit of a trouble as Paul is not comfortable with the changes I made to RM PS.
If we want the changes to be applied, we need a
Hello Axel, Jim,
The CM COS is proceeding as usual but the RM COS is in a bit of a trouble as Paul is not comfortable with the changes I made to RM PS.
If we want the changes to be applied, we need a
|
By
Andrii Berezovskyi
·
#119
·
|
|
Form submission from: Publish a Candidate OASIS Standard
Submitted on Friday, March 5, 2021 - 23:29
Submitted by user: censign
Submitted values are:
Your name: Chet Ensign
TC name: OSLC Open Project
TC email address:
Submitted on Friday, March 5, 2021 - 23:29
Submitted by user: censign
Submitted values are:
Your name: Chet Ensign
TC name: OSLC Open Project
TC email address:
|
By
Chet Ensign
·
#118
·
|
|
Form submission from: Publish a Candidate OASIS Standard
Submitted on Friday, March 5, 2021 - 23:27
Submitted by user: censign
Submitted values are:
Your name: Chet Ensign
TC name: OSLC Open Project
TC email address:
Submitted on Friday, March 5, 2021 - 23:27
Submitted by user: censign
Submitted values are:
Your name: Chet Ensign
TC name: OSLC Open Project
TC email address:
|
By
Chet Ensign
·
#117
·
|
|
locked
Re: Approve submitting OSLC Requirements Management V2.1 PS01 and OSLC Change Management v3.0 PS01 as candidates for OASIS Standard
#poll-notice
#poll-result
Thank you Chet,
Just cast my votes.
--
Cheers,
Andrew
Thank you Chet,
Just cast my votes.
--
Cheers,
Andrew
|
By
Andrii Berezovskyi
·
#116
·
|
|
locked
Approve submitting OSLC Requirements Management V2.1 PS01 and OSLC Change Management v3.0 PS01 as candidates for OASIS Standard
#poll-notice
#poll-result
By
Chet Ensign
·
#115
·
|