|
Slack Free Plan Changes & OCA
I’m fine with dropping slack period. I’m also fine with using free-short and assuming no history at all ( if you want to keep, copy into email). I’m not keen on paying - I just don’t see the value. Du
I’m fine with dropping slack period. I’m also fine with using free-short and assuming no history at all ( if you want to keep, copy into email). I’m not keen on paying - I just don’t see the value. Du
|
By
duncan@sfractal
· #619
·
|
|
Zoom hosts
suggestion for future is that we use OASIS zoom so we can swap hosts easier
suggestion for future is that we use OASIS zoom so we can swap hosts easier
|
By
duncan@sfractal
· #611
·
|
|
New OCA website
Thanks to all the people who put time into this. Looks great. Dumb governance questions: what is the governance on website content? Is it opensource? Where? Are there ‘maintainers’ per classic opensou
Thanks to all the people who put time into this. Looks great. Dumb governance questions: what is the governance on website content? Is it opensource? Where? Are there ‘maintainers’ per classic opensou
|
By
duncan@sfractal
· #597
·
|
|
Apologies - don't just hit reply
Sorry. I mistakenly thought hitting reply would send to Jane, instead I spammed everyone.
Sorry. I mistakenly thought hitting reply would send to Jane, instead I spammed everyone.
|
By
duncan@sfractal
· #583
·
|
|
RSA 2022 & Gartner Analyst Meeting
“1.) Are you attending RSA in June?” Yes, health permitting “2.) Do you plan to attend the OCA Breakfast BoF?” Yes “3.) Is your company exhibiting at RSA?” No but I am running QuadBlockQuiz at SupplyC
“1.) Are you attending RSA in June?” Yes, health permitting “2.) Do you plan to attend the OCA Breakfast BoF?” Yes “3.) Is your company exhibiting at RSA?” No but I am running QuadBlockQuiz at SupplyC
|
By
duncan@sfractal
· #582
·
|
|
Why did 9 OCA members pocket veto CC-BY
Reality is that most “mailing lists”, including this one, go into “not looked at as often if at all” folders in most people’s emails. There are only 16 individuals with the ability to vote. My recomme
Reality is that most “mailing lists”, including this one, go into “not looked at as often if at all” folders in most people’s emails. There are only 16 individuals with the ability to vote. My recomme
|
By
duncan@sfractal
· #547
·
|
|
NIST CyberSecurity Framework & NIICS- OCA Submission(s)
Sounds like a great idea to me.
Sounds like a great idea to me.
|
By
duncan@sfractal
· #545
·
|
|
Why did 9 OCA members pocket veto CC-BY
The vote to approve CC-BY4.0 (https://lists.oasis-open-projects.org/g/oca-pgb/message/535) as a valid OCA license failed because 9 organizations chose to pocket veto by not voting (which counts as a n
The vote to approve CC-BY4.0 (https://lists.oasis-open-projects.org/g/oca-pgb/message/535) as a valid OCA license failed because 9 organizations chose to pocket veto by not voting (which counts as a n
|
By
duncan@sfractal
· #541
·
|
|
Map-my-shifter
I saw an excellent presentation on map-my-shifter at the CTI meeting this month (youtube video of meeting will be available soon). Map-my-shifter is an IBM opensource project that is very closely alig
I saw an excellent presentation on map-my-shifter at the CTI meeting this month (youtube video of meeting will be available soon). Map-my-shifter is an IBM opensource project that is very closely alig
|
By
duncan@sfractal
· #539
·
|
|
Problem with office hours??
FYI I don’t know if it’s just me but I try and join the office hours and get an “unknown error” from zoom. I’ve tried using link (in email below) and I’ve tried from my zoom account using ‘join meetin
FYI I don’t know if it’s just me but I try and join the office hours and get an “unknown error” from zoom. I’ve tried using link (in email below) and I’ve tried from my zoom account using ‘join meetin
|
By
duncan@sfractal
· #537
·
|
|
Meeting minutes and decisions for Feb 3 Meeting (Important!)
Clarification question on the minutes: “Each project or working group will have it’s own Github repo, wiki, and project tracking going forward. This will result in a few new repositories being created
Clarification question on the minutes: “Each project or working group will have it’s own Github repo, wiki, and project tracking going forward. This will result in a few new repositories being created
|
By
duncan@sfractal
· #533
·
|
|
Another Admin Nit
In the spirit of new people looking at our websites, it is not obvious to me the chairs of the PGB. I don’t see it on homepage but that’s ok since home refers to governance on https://opencybersecurit
In the spirit of new people looking at our websites, it is not obvious to me the chairs of the PGB. I don’t see it on homepage but that’s ok since home refers to governance on https://opencybersecurit
|
By
duncan@sfractal
· #527
·
|
|
PGB Agenda for Feb 3 Meeting
Excellent work! Jason, I really appreciate you doing this. I did throw a couple of comments in, nothing I’d fall on my sword over. iPhone, iTypo, iApologize Duncan Sparrell sFractal Consulting, LLC I
Excellent work! Jason, I really appreciate you doing this. I did throw a couple of comments in, nothing I’d fall on my sword over. iPhone, iTypo, iApologize Duncan Sparrell sFractal Consulting, LLC I
|
By
duncan@sfractal
· #524
·
|
|
Ontology - Project or Work Group
Ok. I guess I remembered incorrectly. I thought the one morphed into the other. I recall proposing dropping the OpenDxl in the name and making it more general. I thought that got accepted but I believ
Ok. I guess I remembered incorrectly. I thought the one morphed into the other. I recall proposing dropping the OpenDxl in the name and making it more general. I thought that got accepted but I believ
|
By
duncan@sfractal
· #522
·
|
|
Ontology - Project or Work Group
One of the topics for the PGB agenda will be the topic of work groups. Independent of that topic, I would like to discuss Ontology. Right now, it appears to operating as a subgroup of the Architecture
One of the topics for the PGB agenda will be the topic of work groups. Independent of that topic, I would like to discuss Ontology. Right now, it appears to operating as a subgroup of the Architecture
|
By
duncan@sfractal
· #520
·
|
|
"Doc" License Agenda topic for next PGB meeting
The OASIS Open Projects Rules Section 15.2, https://www.oasis-open.org/policies-guidelines/open-projects-process/#repository-specification-licenses-licenseList, clearly state: … the PGB must select th
The OASIS Open Projects Rules Section 15.2, https://www.oasis-open.org/policies-guidelines/open-projects-process/#repository-specification-licenses-licenseList, clearly state: … the PGB must select th
|
By
duncan@sfractal
· #517
·
|
|
Zero Trust Agenda Item for next PGB
The Zero Trust Sub-Working Group of the Architecture Working Group may propose that OCA join a NCCOE effort on evaluating Zero Trust Architectures. I applaud and support this effort. I think it would
The Zero Trust Sub-Working Group of the Architecture Working Group may propose that OCA join a NCCOE effort on evaluating Zero Trust Architectures. I applaud and support this effort. I think it would
|
By
duncan@sfractal
· #516
·
|
|
Subproject mailing lists and calendars
OCA is an OASIS-Open project and has several subprojects (stixshifter, ontology, kestrel, pace). I am on the pace mailing list which I know about by following a link to the meeting email buried in the
OCA is an OASIS-Open project and has several subprojects (stixshifter, ontology, kestrel, pace). I am on the pace mailing list which I know about by following a link to the meeting email buried in the
|
By
duncan@sfractal
· #509
·
|
|
Requiring 2FA for Github Accounts in OCA
I’m still on boring old send me a github text message which can be hacked by cloning my phone number, which is a fairly sophisticated attack but can be done.
I’m still on boring old send me a github text message which can be hacked by cloning my phone number, which is a fairly sophisticated attack but can be done.
|
By
duncan@sfractal
· #507
·
|
|
Requiring 2FA for Github Accounts in OCA
I’m fine with 2FA since I already have it on my github account (although it’s the less secure text message one, not the fancy yubikey which I probably should get).
I’m fine with 2FA since I already have it on my github account (although it’s the less secure text message one, not the fancy yubikey which I probably should get).
|
By
duncan@sfractal
· #505
·
|