Re: [oca-tsc] [oca-pgb] ArkAngel Onboarding Template
Is this enough to get started? Yes.
Do I think we could improve it? Yes.
I infer this will be an opensource repo. Am I correct? Template should probably have:
“Will opensource software be developed as part of this project?
If yes, is there existing software that will be provided, and how much?
Does submitter propose what license project will operate under or can OCA default be used?
How many repo’s?
What programming language(s)?”
I think the amount of staff hours is trying to get at ‘we have something’ but I think we should have more to help figure out how much already done vs how much to do.
I think stix shifter and OpenDxlOntology were two ends of a spectrum (one had lots, the other was a concept). Something along the lines of:
“How complete is the work to date and how much remains to be done?”
Picking on OpenDxlOntology, another question should get at whether this project depends on another project (e.g. OpenDxlOntology depends on OpenDxl). Eg
“Does this project depend on any other projects within or outside OCA?”
sFractal Consulting LLC
iPhone, iTypo, iApologize
I welcome VSRE emails. Learn more at http://vsre.info/
From: <oca-pgb@...> on behalf of "Adam Montville via lists.oasis-open-projects.org" <adam.montville.sdo=gmail.com@...>
Thanks for percolating this. What decision is this template intended to inform? Is this supporting the initial submission of a project idea and then the process takes it from there, or is the template intended to grow with additional information as the proposal walks through the (yet to be defined) intake process?
What’s missing for me in this template is the why. The ArkAngel template provides a good description of what it is, but doesn’t really indicate why providing an OpenDxl client client for development, integration, testing and demonstration is important or necessary. I don’t have a sense in reading this template why it’s important. Who is being served? What are the anticipated outcomes? What are the pains being relieved or the gains being achieved by having this client available?
Additionally, maybe it would make sense to see how the project proponents would see the work fitting within the reference architecture (once we have one established).